Media Use and Its Societal Effects

How do people obtain information in digital media environments—and what are the consequences for individuals, society, and democracy?

The Media Use and Societal Effects (MUSE) research group investigates how people use news and other information-related content, how these practices are changing in the wake of technological and societal shifts, and what impact this has on individuals, the public, and democratic societies.

Digital Information Environments

Our research focuses on digital information environments. These include traditional news outlets such as news websites and journalism apps, as well as social media, search engines, messaging services, generative AI, and other digital information sources. We examine not only news in the narrow sense, but also a broader spectrum of political and social information that people encounter in their daily lives. We are particularly interested in how the boundaries between journalistic, algorithmic, social, and AI-based information sources are shifting, and what role these different actors play in shaping citizens’ understanding of society.

Information-Use Practices

A key focus of our research is on information-use practices. We examine how people assemble their personal repertoire of information across various platforms, evaluate information, verify its credibility, and deal with conflicting information. This includes, for example, the use of social media for political information, the evaluation and validation of information from generative AI systems, and participatory forms of information engagement. We explore how people search for, select, share, comment on, and integrate information into their daily lives.

Furthermore, we are interested in how new information sources become established. We examine the adoption and use of new technologies, the role of digital media in the socialization of adolescents and young adults, and the conscious or unconscious non-use of news and other information sources.

We also examine the mechanisms of information evaluation and trust-building, as well as how people assess the quality and reliability of information in complex digital information environments.

Societal and Individual Impacts

The research group examines not only how information is used but also its consequences. We are particularly interested in issues of civic engagement, political participation, opinion formation, and democratic agency.

We analyze how digital information environments influence political attitudes and behaviors and what role they play in political polarization, political self-efficacy, trust in institutions, and social cohesion. In doing so, we investigate both the consequences of (a lack of) information and those of misinformation and disinformation.

At the same time, we examine the individual consequences of media use. These include issues of social and societal connectedness, information overload, a sense of social orientation, and the ability to navigate complex information environments.

Research Profile

Methodologically, we combine surveys, digital behavioral data, content analysis, qualitative studies, and computer-assisted methods to capture media use and its consequences as comprehensively and realistically as possible. A particular focus is on combining survey data with digital trace data to better understand actual media behavior and its effects.

Our research is conducted in close collaboration with national and international partners, including GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Amsterdam, the University of Bremen, the University of Hamburg, Aalto University, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, and Friedrich Schiller University Jena.

Since 2013, we have been responsible for the German section of the Reuters Institute Digital News Report, one of the world’s most important comparative long-term studies on digital news and information use. Through this work, we provide key benchmarks on the development of news and information use in Germany and regularly contribute to the academic and public debate on the transformation of digital information environments.

The research group also maintains close ties with stakeholders from the media industry, politics, education, and civil society. We regularly share our research findings through lectures, workshops, and consulting and collaboration projects with journalists and media organizations, including the German Press Agency (dpa), ARD and its regional broadcasters, ZDF, and Deutsche Welle. In addition, we engage in dialogue with policymakers and educational institutions. These collaborations not only facilitate the transfer of scientific findings into practice but also provide important impetus for identifying socially relevant research questions and further developing our research.

The work of the research group’s members has been published in leading international journals, including the *Journal of Communication*, *Communication Theory*, *Communication Research*, *Public Opinion Quarterly*, *The International Journal of Press/Politics*, *Digital Journalism*, *New Media & Society*, *Information, Communication & Society*, *Journalism*, *Journalism Studies*, *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*, *International Journal of Communication*, *European Journal of Communication*, *Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media*, *Social Science Computer Review*, and *Computational Communication Research*. Our research has been funded by the DFG, NWO, BMFTR, DAAD, the state media authorities, and ARD and ZDF.

Overview

Leaders

Last update: 24.09.2026

Blog Articles, News, Projects, Publications, Podcast Episodes

Cover der Zeitschrift KIR
Published on Beck-online

Freedom of Expression in the Age of AI

In their article in a journal on artificial intelligence and law, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz and Moritz Wiechert analyze the first German case law on automatically generated content. In doing so, they highlight the fundamental challenges facing traditional freedom of expression law in the age of AI.

Junge Familie posierend vor einem Ringlicht.
Interview on WDR5

Family Influencers: Is This Real Life?

The WDR5 program on "Curiosity Is Enough" explores family influencers, examining the insight they provide into their daily lives and how they portray their children. Stephan Dreyer offers a media law perspective on the topic. He discusses the results of the HBI study, "Portrayal of Babies and Toddlers in Monetized Social Media Profiles," published in spring 2026.

Portrait Julia Behre vor Bücherwand
Julia Behre on NDR

Why More and More People Are Avoiding the News

Why are more and more people avoiding the news, despite being generally interested in world events? The NDR Info report from July 19, 2026, explores this question. Julia Behre provides a scholarly analysis of news avoidance. The report was part of the NDR television program DAS! Rote Sofa."

Cover der Publikation "Avoiding the News But Still Feeling Connected? The Role of News Use and Avoidance Practices in Different Public Connection Repertoires"
Recently Published!

Avoiding the News But Still Feeling Connected?

How are different forms of news avoidance related to various types of individual public connection? The article by Julia Behre, Lisa Merten, and Uwe Hasebrink suggests that avoiding the news does not necessarily mean turning away from public life.

Portrait Stephan Dreyer
Statement for the SMC

EU Extends Voluntary Chat Control

The European Parliament voted to allow online platforms to continue automatically scanning unencrypted private messages for child abuse under an expedited procedure. In his statement to the Science Media Center Germany, Stephan Dreyer explains why he considers the Parliament's expedited process to be legally controversial and why controlling chat messages constitutes a significant infringement of privacy rights.

Wegweiser mit Beschriftung KI im Journalismus
Interview on radio3 (rbb)

What Can and Is AI Allowed to Do?

Can AI produce positive results in journalism? When does its use threaten journalistic credibility? Antonia Eichenauer addresses these questions in the project "Journalism: The Automation of News and Journalistic Autonomy." In an interview with radio3 (rbb), she discusses the opportunities, risks, and seemingly limitless possibilities of this technology.

Eine Frau im Gespräch bei der ARD-Dialogaktion "Was Deutschland verbindet.
Post on the Media Research Blog

Staying in Conversation Despite Different Opinions? Two Examples

Whether at a family dinner or during a lunch break, differing opinions are a part of everyday life. But what happens when people continue to engage in conversation despite holding controversial views? This article introduces the dialogue formats “What Unites Germany” and “Context Collapse” and shows how such spaces for interaction can contribute to the formation of shared opinions and social cohesion.

Personen bei der ARD-Dialogaktion "Was Deutschland verbindet"
Blog Article on the Dialogue Project "What Unites Germany"

How Conversations with People Who Think Differently Can Make a Difference

On the ARD talk show “What Unites Germany,” people from a wide variety of backgrounds engage in conversation with one another. As part of the project, the HBI is conducting research to determine how these discussions influence the participants’ attitudes. The initial findings are now available.

Cover Organizational Research Methods Journal
Open Access Publication!

Argument Mining for Organizational Research

How do organizations justify their decisions, establish legitimacy, and engage with their environment through communication? This article introduces aspect-based argument mining (ABAM) as a new method for answering these questions. ABAM can identify patterns of argumentation in large text corpora, such as the Twitter debate on nuclear energy in Germany.

Cover des Arbeitspapiers
Available for Download

Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2026: Findings for Germany

Since 2012, the Reuters Institute Digital News Survey has conducted annual, representative surveys in 48 countries to examine general trends and national differences in news consumption. As a cooperation partner, the Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut is responsible for the German sub-study. The 2026 findings are now available for download.

Cover des Berichts
Open Access Publication

Social Cohesion – Experiences and Expectations of People with Disabilities Regarding Participation

Jan-Hinrik Schmidt and Milena Braun conducted a study on behalf of Aktion Mensch examining how people with disabilities perceive social cohesion in Germany. The study allows for a comparison with the general population and reveals that, despite being more likely to participate in politics and volunteer work, people with disabilities experience less social cohesion.

Expertenkommission mit Bundesministerin Prien vor einer blauen Wand mit den Flaggen der Europäischen Union und Deutschlands
Protecting Children and Youth in the Digital World

Protection, Empowerment, and Participation: Recommendations for Action from the Expert Commission

The independent expert commission "Protection of Children and Youth in the Digital World" submitted its recommendations to Federal Minister of Education and Family Affairs Karin Prien. Dr. Claudia Lampert's expertise was incorporated into the commission's work.

1 2 3 4 5 … 43

Page 3 from 43

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now