Media Use and Its Societal Effects

How do people obtain information in digital media environments—and what are the consequences for individuals, society, and democracy?

The Media Use and Societal Effects (MUSE) research group investigates how people use news and other information-related content, how these practices are changing in the wake of technological and societal shifts, and what impact this has on individuals, the public, and democratic societies.

Digital Information Environments

Our research focuses on digital information environments. These include traditional news outlets such as news websites and journalism apps, as well as social media, search engines, messaging services, generative AI, and other digital information sources. We examine not only news in the narrow sense, but also a broader spectrum of political and social information that people encounter in their daily lives. We are particularly interested in how the boundaries between journalistic, algorithmic, social, and AI-based information sources are shifting, and what role these different actors play in shaping citizens’ understanding of society.

Information-Use Practices

A key focus of our research is on information-use practices. We examine how people assemble their personal repertoire of information across various platforms, evaluate information, verify its credibility, and deal with conflicting information. This includes, for example, the use of social media for political information, the evaluation and validation of information from generative AI systems, and participatory forms of information engagement. We explore how people search for, select, share, comment on, and integrate information into their daily lives.

Furthermore, we are interested in how new information sources become established. We examine the adoption and use of new technologies, the role of digital media in the socialization of adolescents and young adults, and the conscious or unconscious non-use of news and other information sources.

We also examine the mechanisms of information evaluation and trust-building, as well as how people assess the quality and reliability of information in complex digital information environments.

Societal and Individual Impacts

The research group examines not only how information is used but also its consequences. We are particularly interested in issues of civic engagement, political participation, opinion formation, and democratic agency.

We analyze how digital information environments influence political attitudes and behaviors and what role they play in political polarization, political self-efficacy, trust in institutions, and social cohesion. In doing so, we investigate both the consequences of (a lack of) information and those of misinformation and disinformation.

At the same time, we examine the individual consequences of media use. These include issues of social and societal connectedness, information overload, a sense of social orientation, and the ability to navigate complex information environments.

Research Profile

Methodologically, we combine surveys, digital behavioral data, content analysis, qualitative studies, and computer-assisted methods to capture media use and its consequences as comprehensively and realistically as possible. A particular focus is on combining survey data with digital trace data to better understand actual media behavior and its effects.

Our research is conducted in close collaboration with national and international partners, including GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Amsterdam, the University of Bremen, the University of Hamburg, Aalto University, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, and Friedrich Schiller University Jena.

Since 2013, we have been responsible for the German section of the Reuters Institute Digital News Report, one of the world’s most important comparative long-term studies on digital news and information use. Through this work, we provide key benchmarks on the development of news and information use in Germany and regularly contribute to the academic and public debate on the transformation of digital information environments.

The research group also maintains close ties with stakeholders from the media industry, politics, education, and civil society. We regularly share our research findings through lectures, workshops, and consulting and collaboration projects with journalists and media organizations, including the German Press Agency (dpa), ARD and its regional broadcasters, ZDF, and Deutsche Welle. In addition, we engage in dialogue with policymakers and educational institutions. These collaborations not only facilitate the transfer of scientific findings into practice but also provide important impetus for identifying socially relevant research questions and further developing our research.

The work of the research group’s members has been published in leading international journals, including the *Journal of Communication*, *Communication Theory*, *Communication Research*, *Public Opinion Quarterly*, *The International Journal of Press/Politics*, *Digital Journalism*, *New Media & Society*, *Information, Communication & Society*, *Journalism*, *Journalism Studies*, *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*, *International Journal of Communication*, *European Journal of Communication*, *Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media*, *Social Science Computer Review*, and *Computational Communication Research*. Our research has been funded by the DFG, NWO, BMFTR, DAAD, the state media authorities, and ARD and ZDF.

Overview

Leaders

Last update: 24.09.2026

Blog Articles, News, Projects, Publications, Podcast Episodes

Cover der Publikation
Article in Handbook

This is Not a Drill”: International Law and Protection of Cybersecurity

Matthias C. Kettemann examines the role of international law in protecting cybersecurity and explores how legal norms can address cross-border digital threats.

Cover der Publikation
Introduction to Handbook

Introduction to the Handbook Human Rights and Digital Technology

Matthias C. Kettemann introduces the key questions of the handbook and explores how digital technologies create new challenges for human rights, global governance, and legal regulation.

Portrait Matthias C. Kettemann
Blog Article

How an Online Order Fights Fragmentation

The Internet will not fall apart. Matthias C. Kettemann explains in the Digital Society Blog, a normative shift has taken place on the Internet, leading to the emergence of a normative order for the Internet.

Cover
Contribution to Handbook

Talking to People I: Surveys

In their contribution to the Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research, Uwe Hasebrink and Sascha Hölig write about one of the most important tools in communication science: the survey.

Cover der Publikation "Schriftliche Stellungnahme zum zweiten Diskussionsentwurf eines Medienstaatsvertrages der Länder"
Written Statement

Written Statement on the Second Draft of an Interstate Media Treaty

The new Interstate Media Treaty (MStV) is supposed to modernise media regulation and adapt it to new forms of offerings and usage. Like the first version, the core of the revised draft aims to include new media actors in the scope of application of the State Treaty. The media law experts Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz and Dr. Stephan Dreyer have again published a statement on this draft.

Cover der Publikation "Non-commemorative memory in news production"
“Memory” in Journalistic Practice

Non-Commemorative Memory in News Production

This paper, published by Irene Broer and lead author Stefanie Trümper in the journal *Memory Studies*, explores how media professionals incorporate memories of historical events into their journalistic work.

Cover
Journal Article

Uses of the Past in Refugee Documentaries in Sweden and Germany

The article by Hans-Ulrich Wagner and guest researcher Philipp Seuferling in the journal Media History focuses on the memory culture of migration in the media on a theoretical and empirical level.

Portrait Matthias C. Kettemann
Article on Tagesspiegel

The Internet for Everyone

We don’t need new fundamental and human rights for the “Internet age.” The rules already in place are sufficient. They just need to be applied in a way that takes technology into account, argues Dr. Matthias Kettemann in the "Tagesspiegel".

Cover des Online Beitrags "
Völkerrechtsblog

The GDPR and Algorithmic Decision-Making

Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz ask the following question in their contribution to the Völkerrechtsblog [international law blog]: To what extent can the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) protect the interests of individuals, groups and society as a whole that appear to be threatened by algorithmic decision-making systems?

Cover der Publikation
Media Education

Media Education from the Perspective of the Constitution

In the volume Medienerziehung in der digitalen Welt. Grundlagen und Konzepte für Familie, Kita, Schule und Soziale Arbeit [Media Education in the Digital World. Foundations and Concepts for Family, Kita, School and Social Work], Stephan Dreyer writes about media education from a constitutional point of view.

Cover
Local journalism reloaded

Molo.news: Experimentally Developing a Relational Platform for Local Journalism

Andreas Hepp (ZeMKI, University of Bremen) and Wiebke Loosen present the project molo.news in an article in the journal Media and Communication. They developed an online platform for local journalism based on the findings of previous interviews, group discussions and surveys.

1 … 39 40 41 42 43

Page 41 from 43

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now