Media Use and Its Societal Effects

How do people obtain information in digital media environments—and what are the consequences for individuals, society, and democracy?

The Media Use and Societal Effects (MUSE) research group investigates how people use news and other information-related content, how these practices are changing in the wake of technological and societal shifts, and what impact this has on individuals, the public, and democratic societies.

Digital Information Environments

Our research focuses on digital information environments. These include traditional news outlets such as news websites and journalism apps, as well as social media, search engines, messaging services, generative AI, and other digital information sources. We examine not only news in the narrow sense, but also a broader spectrum of political and social information that people encounter in their daily lives. We are particularly interested in how the boundaries between journalistic, algorithmic, social, and AI-based information sources are shifting, and what role these different actors play in shaping citizens’ understanding of society.

Information-Use Practices

A key focus of our research is on information-use practices. We examine how people assemble their personal repertoire of information across various platforms, evaluate information, verify its credibility, and deal with conflicting information. This includes, for example, the use of social media for political information, the evaluation and validation of information from generative AI systems, and participatory forms of information engagement. We explore how people search for, select, share, comment on, and integrate information into their daily lives.

Furthermore, we are interested in how new information sources become established. We examine the adoption and use of new technologies, the role of digital media in the socialization of adolescents and young adults, and the conscious or unconscious non-use of news and other information sources.

We also examine the mechanisms of information evaluation and trust-building, as well as how people assess the quality and reliability of information in complex digital information environments.

Societal and Individual Impacts

The research group examines not only how information is used but also its consequences. We are particularly interested in issues of civic engagement, political participation, opinion formation, and democratic agency.

We analyze how digital information environments influence political attitudes and behaviors and what role they play in political polarization, political self-efficacy, trust in institutions, and social cohesion. In doing so, we investigate both the consequences of (a lack of) information and those of misinformation and disinformation.

At the same time, we examine the individual consequences of media use. These include issues of social and societal connectedness, information overload, a sense of social orientation, and the ability to navigate complex information environments.

Research Profile

Methodologically, we combine surveys, digital behavioral data, content analysis, qualitative studies, and computer-assisted methods to capture media use and its consequences as comprehensively and realistically as possible. A particular focus is on combining survey data with digital trace data to better understand actual media behavior and its effects.

Our research is conducted in close collaboration with national and international partners, including GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Amsterdam, the University of Bremen, the University of Hamburg, Aalto University, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, and Friedrich Schiller University Jena.

Since 2013, we have been responsible for the German section of the Reuters Institute Digital News Report, one of the world’s most important comparative long-term studies on digital news and information use. Through this work, we provide key benchmarks on the development of news and information use in Germany and regularly contribute to the academic and public debate on the transformation of digital information environments.

The research group also maintains close ties with stakeholders from the media industry, politics, education, and civil society. We regularly share our research findings through lectures, workshops, and consulting and collaboration projects with journalists and media organizations, including the German Press Agency (dpa), ARD and its regional broadcasters, ZDF, and Deutsche Welle. In addition, we engage in dialogue with policymakers and educational institutions. These collaborations not only facilitate the transfer of scientific findings into practice but also provide important impetus for identifying socially relevant research questions and further developing our research.

The work of the research group’s members has been published in leading international journals, including the *Journal of Communication*, *Communication Theory*, *Communication Research*, *Public Opinion Quarterly*, *The International Journal of Press/Politics*, *Digital Journalism*, *New Media & Society*, *Information, Communication & Society*, *Journalism*, *Journalism Studies*, *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*, *International Journal of Communication*, *European Journal of Communication*, *Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media*, *Social Science Computer Review*, and *Computational Communication Research*. Our research has been funded by the DFG, NWO, BMFTR, DAAD, the state media authorities, and ARD and ZDF.

Overview

Leaders

Last update: 24.09.2026

Blog Articles, News, Projects, Publications, Podcast Episodes

Cover der ZEitschrift
Book Article

What Is Your Problem? Online Experiences from the Perspective of Children and Parents

In the anthology "Family Culture: Smart and Digital—Findings, Concepts, and Strategies in Media Education", Claudia Lampert, Kira Thiel, and Uwe Hasebrink write about online experiences from the perspectives of children and parents.

Cover Arbeitspapier
Report for Download

Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020

For the ninth consecutive year, the Reuters Institute Digital News Report, which provides an international comparison of news consumption, has been published. The German component of the study was conducted by Sascha Hölig and Uwe Hasebrink, with the assistance of Julia Behre.

Cover Reuters Institute Digital News Report - Ergebnisse für Deutschland. 2019
Report for Download

Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019

The international comparison of news consumption was published on June 12, 2019. In 2019, approximately 2,000 people were surveyed in each country. In total, this eighth edition of the study is based on 75,749 respondents from 38 countries.

Cover
Expert Opinion

Human Rights and Political Participation in the Digital Age

At the invitation of the Committee on Human Rights and Humanitarian Aid of the German Bundestag, Matthias C. Kettemann addresses in this statement twelve questions of the Bundestag factions concerning human rights and political participation.

Cover
What Rights Do Users Have?

Back Up: Can Users Sue Platforms to Reinstate Deleted Content?

In their article published in Internet Policy Review, Matthias C. Kettemann and Anna Sophia Tiedeke ask under what conditions users can sue providers to reinstate deleted content on social media platforms.

Cover: Zeitschrift "Comunicazioni Sociali"
Media Repertoires of Internet Users

Combining Old and New: Patterns of Media Use across Legacy and Online Media in Germany

Julia Behre, Sascha Hölig, and Uwe Hasebrink have published an article in the journal *Comunicazioni Sociali* on the media repertoires of adult Internet users in Germany.

Cover der Zeitschrift "merz", Ausg. 64 (3), 2020
EU Kids Online

Online Experiences of Children and Young People in Europe

What are the experiences of children and adolescents in Europe when they are online? The international comparative study “EU Kids Online” examines this question. In the journal "medien+erziehung", Claudia Lampert, Kira Thiel, and Uwe Hasebrink provide an overview of the study and the experiences of 9- to 16-year-olds.

Cover des Arbeitspapiers Nr. 49
Working Paper Nr. 49 for Download

What Journalists Ought to Do and What They Want to Do

In this working paper, Wiebke Loosen, Julius Reimer, and Sascha Hölig examine the relationship between journalists’ self-perception of their role and the public’s expectations of journalism in Germany.

Matthias Kettemann und Stephan Dreyer
Expert Statement for the SMC

SMC Statements on Trump’s Twitter Decree

In the "Rapid Reactions" section on the website of the Science Media Center Germany, Stephan Dreyer and Matthias Kettemann give their views on a new executive order by the US government that is intended to restrict the protection of social media in the United States.

Cover
Researching News Use

Contextualized Repertoire Maps: Exploring the Role of Social Media in News-Related Media Repertoires

In this paper, Lisa Merten presents a qualitative method for researching the patterns of news use: the Contextualized Repertoire Maps.

Wolfgang Schulz und Stephan Dreyer
Youth Protection Act

Written Statement on the Draft Youth Protection Act

Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz have written a statement on the draft Youth Protection Act.

Portrait Matthias C. Kettemann
Publication

Cross-Pollination in Cyberspace and the Internet Governance “Spaghetti-Ball”

Together with Wolfgang Kleinwächter (University of Aarhus), Max Senges (Google Germany) and Jörg Schweiger (DENIC), Matthias C. Kettemann has made proposals for the reform of the Internet Governance Architecture, which is currently being discussed under UN aegis.

1 … 36 37 38 39 40 … 43

Page 38 from 43

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now