Media Use and Its Societal Effects

How do people obtain information in digital media environments—and what are the consequences for individuals, society, and democracy?

The Media Use and Societal Effects (MUSE) research group investigates how people use news and other information-related content, how these practices are changing in the wake of technological and societal shifts, and what impact this has on individuals, the public, and democratic societies.

Digital Information Environments

Our research focuses on digital information environments. These include traditional news outlets such as news websites and journalism apps, as well as social media, search engines, messaging services, generative AI, and other digital information sources. We examine not only news in the narrow sense, but also a broader spectrum of political and social information that people encounter in their daily lives. We are particularly interested in how the boundaries between journalistic, algorithmic, social, and AI-based information sources are shifting, and what role these different actors play in shaping citizens’ understanding of society.

Information-Use Practices

A key focus of our research is on information-use practices. We examine how people assemble their personal repertoire of information across various platforms, evaluate information, verify its credibility, and deal with conflicting information. This includes, for example, the use of social media for political information, the evaluation and validation of information from generative AI systems, and participatory forms of information engagement. We explore how people search for, select, share, comment on, and integrate information into their daily lives.

Furthermore, we are interested in how new information sources become established. We examine the adoption and use of new technologies, the role of digital media in the socialization of adolescents and young adults, and the conscious or unconscious non-use of news and other information sources.

We also examine the mechanisms of information evaluation and trust-building, as well as how people assess the quality and reliability of information in complex digital information environments.

Societal and Individual Impacts

The research group examines not only how information is used but also its consequences. We are particularly interested in issues of civic engagement, political participation, opinion formation, and democratic agency.

We analyze how digital information environments influence political attitudes and behaviors and what role they play in political polarization, political self-efficacy, trust in institutions, and social cohesion. In doing so, we investigate both the consequences of (a lack of) information and those of misinformation and disinformation.

At the same time, we examine the individual consequences of media use. These include issues of social and societal connectedness, information overload, a sense of social orientation, and the ability to navigate complex information environments.

Research Profile

Methodologically, we combine surveys, digital behavioral data, content analysis, qualitative studies, and computer-assisted methods to capture media use and its consequences as comprehensively and realistically as possible. A particular focus is on combining survey data with digital trace data to better understand actual media behavior and its effects.

Our research is conducted in close collaboration with national and international partners, including GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Amsterdam, the University of Bremen, the University of Hamburg, Aalto University, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, and Friedrich Schiller University Jena.

Since 2013, we have been responsible for the German section of the Reuters Institute Digital News Report, one of the world’s most important comparative long-term studies on digital news and information use. Through this work, we provide key benchmarks on the development of news and information use in Germany and regularly contribute to the academic and public debate on the transformation of digital information environments.

The research group also maintains close ties with stakeholders from the media industry, politics, education, and civil society. We regularly share our research findings through lectures, workshops, and consulting and collaboration projects with journalists and media organizations, including the German Press Agency (dpa), ARD and its regional broadcasters, ZDF, and Deutsche Welle. In addition, we engage in dialogue with policymakers and educational institutions. These collaborations not only facilitate the transfer of scientific findings into practice but also provide important impetus for identifying socially relevant research questions and further developing our research.

The work of the research group’s members has been published in leading international journals, including the *Journal of Communication*, *Communication Theory*, *Communication Research*, *Public Opinion Quarterly*, *The International Journal of Press/Politics*, *Digital Journalism*, *New Media & Society*, *Information, Communication & Society*, *Journalism*, *Journalism Studies*, *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*, *International Journal of Communication*, *European Journal of Communication*, *Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media*, *Social Science Computer Review*, and *Computational Communication Research*. Our research has been funded by the DFG, NWO, BMFTR, DAAD, the state media authorities, and ARD and ZDF.

Overview

Leaders

Last update: 24.09.2026

Blog Articles, News, Projects, Publications, Podcast Episodes

Martin Fertmann
Platform Regulation

Private Power and Private Separation of Powers

Who should decide what can be said on digital platforms? Martin Fertmann and Matthias Kettemann write in Tagesspiegel Background about how institutions can be structured to address this issue, where the risks lie, and what role the Facebook Oversight Board plays in this context.

Cover der Publikation der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung "Die Demokratie plattformfest machen"
Brief Report

Making Democracy Platform-Proof

In their brief report, published by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, Matthias C. Kettemann and Martin Fertmann describe how social media councils can serve as a tool for fostering social accountability within the private governance structures of digital platforms.

Cover der Zeitschrift New Media & Society, Ausgabe Mai 2021
News Consumption Around the World

Online News Usage in China, The United States and Five European Countries

In their article, Sascha Hölig, Uwe Hasebrink, and Julia Behre provide insights into the use of online news in seven countries with different media systems.

Cover der Publikation "Aufwachsen in überwachten Umgebungen"
Open Access!

Safe Spaces for Children’s Stages of Development in the Digital Society

Stephan Dreyer writes about safe spaces for children’s developmental stages in the digital society in the anthology *Growing Up in Monitored Environments*, which has just been published as open access by Nomos.

Cover of the working paper Use The News
Study Available for Download

#UseTheNews. Study on News Literacy Among Adolescents and Young Adults in the Digital Media World

#UseTheNews is the first scientific study to examine the news consumption habits of teenagers and young adults with such detail and precision.

Stephan Dreyer
Article in the Tagesspiegel

Youth Protection Act: New but Also Better?

The reform of the Youth Protection Act introduces several changes, but are they really an improvement over the previous version? In a piece for "Tagesspiegel Background", media law expert Stephan Dreyer shares his assessment of these changes.

Kugel mit unzähligen Portaitfotos darauf. Im Hintergrund, die Verdrahtungen einer Festplatte.
World's Largest Journalism Study

Journalism under Duress

As part of the world's largest journalism study, "Worlds of Journalism", this representative survey examines the profession of journalism and explores the stresses and strains faced by professional journalists in Germany.

Cover: Can Platforms cancel Politicians?
Platform Regulation

Can Platforms Cancel Politicians?

This working paper examines how political actors are treated on private online platforms in 15 European countries. It was published by Martin Fertmann and Matthias C. Kettemann as part of the Global Digital Human Rights Network Paper Series and is available free of charge as open access.

Wooden judge's gavel against a dark background
Platform Governance

Making Courts Count in Global Content Governance

Technological change poses new challenges for courts, while their decisions and the quasi-judicial structures of digital platforms increasingly shape the rules of digitality.

Cover: Content Analyses of User Comments in
Journalism A Systematic Literature Review
Spanning Communication Studies and Computer
Science
Article in Digital Journalism

Content Analyses of User Comments in Online Journalism

In their article, Julius Reimer, Wiebke Loosen, and Lisa Merten, together with Marlo Häring and Walid Maalej, present a systematic literature review on the content analysis of user comments in a journalistic context.

Media Research Blog

Trump’s social media ban

Trump’s ban from social media, while gaining significant media attention, does not represent an isolated case. Preventing individuals from accessing social media platforms or parts of them is a common phenomenon today. Edoardo Celeste terms it ‘social media exclusion’ and argues that it is possible to distinguish three types of this phenomenon on the basis of the actors and specific underlying factors determining the users’ exclusion.

Martin Fertmann
Post on the JuWissBlog

Censorship or Self-Defense? On the Blocking of Opposition Media in Ukraine

Martin Fertmann and Leif Thorian Schmied write on the “Junge Wissenschaft im Öffentlichen Recht” blog about the shutdown of three pro-Russian television stations in Ukraine. The stations were banned by decree—without a court proceeding—through a joint decision by President Zelenskyy and the National Security and Defense Council.

1 … 31 32 33 34 35 … 43

Page 33 from 43

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now