Transformation of Journalism and the Public Sphere

The research group ‘Transformation of Journalism and the Public Sphere’ examines the transformation of journalism and the public sphere through an empirical and theory-driven approach – partly to understand what this means for democratic cohesion.

Journalism and the public sphere are emerging under new circumstances today: artificial intelligence is not merely intervening from the outside, but is becoming part of society’s communicative DNA. Language models help shape the narrative, platforms pre-sort content, and recommendation systems decide what reaches the public sphere in the first place – and this is shifting the way society communicates with itself.

One focus of the research group is on communicative AI: language models and automated systems have long since ceased to be mere tools; instead, they are themselves becoming participants in social communication. They intervene deeply in the structures through which the public sphere is formed. We analyse this reciprocal appropriation: how AI permeates communicative fields such as journalism, whilst at the same time being appropriated and integrated by people and organisations.

Another strand of our research examines the role that media and communication play in fostering – or jeopardising – social cohesion, and how the social order of understanding and media usage are changing in the digital age – supported by empirical evidence, for example through surveys on the cohesion-related services provided by public service broadcasters or participation in the qualitative panel of the Research Institute for Social Cohesion. Knowledge transfer is of particular importance here: we actively contribute our findings to public discourse and to dialogue with editorial teams, educational institutions and opinion leaders.

Our research is theory-driven, interdisciplinary, methodologically open, internationally networked – and consistently conducted through dialogue-oriented exchange with practitioners and the public. As part of the Worlds of Journalism Study (WJS), the world’s largest comparative study on the state of journalism, we contribute to international journalism research.

Overview

Leaders

Last update: 24.09.2026

Blog Articles, News, Projects, Publications, Podcast Episodes

Martin Fertmann
Platform Regulation

Private Power and Private Separation of Powers

Who should decide what can be said on digital platforms? Martin Fertmann and Matthias Kettemann write in Tagesspiegel Background about how institutions can be structured to address this issue, where the risks lie, and what role the Facebook Oversight Board plays in this context.

Cover der Publikation der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung "Die Demokratie plattformfest machen"
Brief Report

Making Democracy Platform-Proof

In their brief report, published by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, Matthias C. Kettemann and Martin Fertmann describe how social media councils can serve as a tool for fostering social accountability within the private governance structures of digital platforms.

Cover der Zeitschrift New Media & Society, Ausgabe Mai 2021
News Consumption Around the World

Online News Usage in China, The United States and Five European Countries

In their article, Sascha Hölig, Uwe Hasebrink, and Julia Behre provide insights into the use of online news in seven countries with different media systems.

Cover der Publikation "Aufwachsen in überwachten Umgebungen"
Open Access!

Safe Spaces for Children’s Stages of Development in the Digital Society

Stephan Dreyer writes about safe spaces for children’s developmental stages in the digital society in the anthology *Growing Up in Monitored Environments*, which has just been published as open access by Nomos.

Cover of the working paper Use The News
Study Available for Download

#UseTheNews. Study on News Literacy Among Adolescents and Young Adults in the Digital Media World

#UseTheNews is the first scientific study to examine the news consumption habits of teenagers and young adults with such detail and precision.

Stephan Dreyer
Article in the Tagesspiegel

Youth Protection Act: New but Also Better?

The reform of the Youth Protection Act introduces several changes, but are they really an improvement over the previous version? In a piece for "Tagesspiegel Background", media law expert Stephan Dreyer shares his assessment of these changes.

Kugel mit unzähligen Portaitfotos darauf. Im Hintergrund, die Verdrahtungen einer Festplatte.
World's Largest Journalism Study

Journalism under Duress

As part of the world's largest journalism study, "Worlds of Journalism", this representative survey examines the profession of journalism and explores the stresses and strains faced by professional journalists in Germany.

Cover: Can Platforms cancel Politicians?
Platform Regulation

Can Platforms Cancel Politicians?

This working paper examines how political actors are treated on private online platforms in 15 European countries. It was published by Martin Fertmann and Matthias C. Kettemann as part of the Global Digital Human Rights Network Paper Series and is available free of charge as open access.

Wooden judge's gavel against a dark background
Platform Governance

Making Courts Count in Global Content Governance

Technological change poses new challenges for courts, while their decisions and the quasi-judicial structures of digital platforms increasingly shape the rules of digitality.

Cover: Content Analyses of User Comments in
Journalism A Systematic Literature Review
Spanning Communication Studies and Computer
Science
Article in Digital Journalism

Content Analyses of User Comments in Online Journalism

In their article, Julius Reimer, Wiebke Loosen, and Lisa Merten, together with Marlo Häring and Walid Maalej, present a systematic literature review on the content analysis of user comments in a journalistic context.

Media Research Blog

Trump’s social media ban

Trump’s ban from social media, while gaining significant media attention, does not represent an isolated case. Preventing individuals from accessing social media platforms or parts of them is a common phenomenon today. Edoardo Celeste terms it ‘social media exclusion’ and argues that it is possible to distinguish three types of this phenomenon on the basis of the actors and specific underlying factors determining the users’ exclusion.

Martin Fertmann
Post on the JuWissBlog

Censorship or Self-Defense? On the Blocking of Opposition Media in Ukraine

Martin Fertmann and Leif Thorian Schmied write on the “Junge Wissenschaft im Öffentlichen Recht” blog about the shutdown of three pro-Russian television stations in Ukraine. The stations were banned by decree—without a court proceeding—through a joint decision by President Zelenskyy and the National Security and Defense Council.

1 … 31 32 33 34 35 … 43

Page 33 from 43

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now