Transformation of Journalism and the Public Sphere

The research group ‘Transformation of Journalism and the Public Sphere’ examines the transformation of journalism and the public sphere through an empirical and theory-driven approach – partly to understand what this means for democratic cohesion.

Journalism and the public sphere are emerging under new circumstances today: artificial intelligence is not merely intervening from the outside, but is becoming part of society’s communicative DNA. Language models help shape the narrative, platforms pre-sort content, and recommendation systems decide what reaches the public sphere in the first place – and this is shifting the way society communicates with itself.

One focus of the research group is on communicative AI: language models and automated systems have long since ceased to be mere tools; instead, they are themselves becoming participants in social communication. They intervene deeply in the structures through which the public sphere is formed. We analyse this reciprocal appropriation: how AI permeates communicative fields such as journalism, whilst at the same time being appropriated and integrated by people and organisations.

Another strand of our research examines the role that media and communication play in fostering – or jeopardising – social cohesion, and how the social order of understanding and media usage are changing in the digital age – supported by empirical evidence, for example through surveys on the cohesion-related services provided by public service broadcasters or participation in the qualitative panel of the Research Institute for Social Cohesion. Knowledge transfer is of particular importance here: we actively contribute our findings to public discourse and to dialogue with editorial teams, educational institutions and opinion leaders.

Our research is theory-driven, interdisciplinary, methodologically open, internationally networked – and consistently conducted through dialogue-oriented exchange with practitioners and the public. As part of the Worlds of Journalism Study (WJS), the world’s largest comparative study on the state of journalism, we contribute to international journalism research.

Overview

Leaders

Last update: 24.09.2026

Blog Articles, News, Projects, Publications, Podcast Episodes

Cover
Intermediaries and Social Cohesion

The Participation Paradox. Structural Change of the Public in Times of Digital Intermediaries

In the latest issue of the journal Tendenz, Jan-Hinrik Schmidt asks whether social cohesion is under threat and how the public has changed in the age of digital intermediaries.

Written Statement on the Draft of a Second Act Amending the Youth Protection Act

On 11 February 2020, the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (BMFSFJ) submitted a draft of a second law amending the Youth Protection Act (JuSchG). Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz the current hearing of associations as an opportunity to comment on the draft.

Cover
Safer Internet Day 2020

Digital Participation of Children and Young People

Uwe Hasebrink, Claudia Lampert, and Kira Thiel examined the extent to which children and adolescents recognize and take advantage of opportunities for strategic networking and social participation on the Internet. The special analysis, conducted as part of the EU Kids Online project, was published on Safer Internet Day, February 11, 2020.

Cover: GDHR Net Working Paper, #1/2020
COVID-19 and Misinformation

How States and Platforms Deal with Covid-19-related Disinformation

This working paper examines how COVID-19-related misinformation is handled on online platforms in 20 different countries. It was published by Matthias C. Kettemann and Martin Fertmann as part of the Global Digital Human Rights Network Paper Series and is available free of charge as open access.

Cover
Research for Facebook for the First Time

Setting Rules for 2.7 Billion

For the first time, Facebook has given scientists direct access to internal decision-making bodies. PD Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz from HBI have investigated how Facebook develops communication rules for its platform. The results of this pilot study have now been published.

Cover
Book Chapter

Modelling and Verification in GDPR’s Data Protection Impact Assessment

Using a case study on the AccuWeather/Reveal Mobile case, Wolfgang Schulz and Florian Wittner, together with Kai Bavendiek and Sibylle Schupp, assess the consequences of the basic data protection regulation.

Cover
Interviewing Capital City Journalists

Twitter in Political Journalism

Together with Christian Nuernbergk, Jan-Hinrik Schmidt analyses the importance of Twitter in the work of political journalists in an article in the journal Publizistik.

Junge mit Maske sitzt vor einem Bildschirm.
Digital Media Use in Corona Times

Kids Digital Lives in Covid-19 Times

What impact is the COVID-19 crisis having on families and children and how they use digital media? The HBI took part in a European comparative study conducted by the European Commission’s Joint Research Center (JRC), carrying out a sub-survey in Germany.

Cover
Intermediaries and Democracy

The Cooperative Thrust Is Promising

In "Wer regiert das Internet? [Who rules the internet?]" PD Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann answers three questions on the topics of information intermediaries as well as whether disinformation and hate speech are a danger to democracy.

Cover
Article on Anthology

Freedom of Expression Online

In their contribution to the volume Human Rights, Digital Society and the Law, Matthias Kettemann and Wolfgang Benedek show that freedom of expression is a central right of the information society and that states and companies have certain obligations to protect it.

Cover
Literature and Broadcasting

Writers and Radio: How Literary Authors Have Made Use of the Medium over a Century

In his article in the Journal for Media History, Hans-Ulrich Wagner writes about the interaction between literary authors and the medium radio.

Cover
Article in Anthology

Hate Speech and Cat Pictures

Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann and Katharina Mosene describe in their contribution to the anthology "Hass im Netz - Grenzen digitaler Freiheit [Hate Online – Limits of Digital Freedom]" how effective the governance of freedom of expression on the Internet is in the fight against hate speech.

1 … 37 38 39 40 41 … 43

Page 39 from 43

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now