Transformation of Journalism and the Public Sphere

The research group ‘Transformation of Journalism and the Public Sphere’ examines the transformation of journalism and the public sphere through an empirical and theory-driven approach – partly to understand what this means for democratic cohesion.

Journalism and the public sphere are emerging under new circumstances today: artificial intelligence is not merely intervening from the outside, but is becoming part of society’s communicative DNA. Language models help shape the narrative, platforms pre-sort content, and recommendation systems decide what reaches the public sphere in the first place – and this is shifting the way society communicates with itself.

One focus of the research group is on communicative AI: language models and automated systems have long since ceased to be mere tools; instead, they are themselves becoming participants in social communication. They intervene deeply in the structures through which the public sphere is formed. We analyse this reciprocal appropriation: how AI permeates communicative fields such as journalism, whilst at the same time being appropriated and integrated by people and organisations.

Another strand of our research examines the role that media and communication play in fostering – or jeopardising – social cohesion, and how the social order of understanding and media usage are changing in the digital age – supported by empirical evidence, for example through surveys on the cohesion-related services provided by public service broadcasters or participation in the qualitative panel of the Research Institute for Social Cohesion. Knowledge transfer is of particular importance here: we actively contribute our findings to public discourse and to dialogue with editorial teams, educational institutions and opinion leaders.

Our research is theory-driven, interdisciplinary, methodologically open, internationally networked – and consistently conducted through dialogue-oriented exchange with practitioners and the public. As part of the Worlds of Journalism Study (WJS), the world’s largest comparative study on the state of journalism, we contribute to international journalism research.

Overview

Leaders

Last update: 24.09.2026

Blog Articles, News, Projects, Publications, Podcast Episodes

Cover
Article in Zeitschrift der Initiative Minderheiten

Courts as Drivers of Social Progress between Škocjan and Topeka

Matthias C. Kettemann uses international court decisions to demonstrate how courts can drive social change and act as agents of minority protection.

Cover der Publikation "Fritz Bauer und das Radio" von Hans-Ulrich Wagner
Online Article

Fritz Bauer and the Radio

Dr. Hans Ulrich Wagner  examines how Fritz Bauer used radio to communicate legal reform, democratic values, and the confrontation with the Nazi past to a broad public.

Cover des Berichts "Künstliche Intelligenz, Intermediäre und Öffentlichkeit. Bericht an das BAKOM"
Recently published

Artificial Intelligence, Intermediaries, and the Public. Report to OFCOM

The report, authored by Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz for the Swiss Federal Office of Communications (OFKOM), examines the influence of AI and information intermediaries on the formation of public opinion.

Portrait Matthias C. Kettemann
Blog Article

A Proposal for More Structured Normativity on the Internet

Matthias C. Kettemann argues for a more structured normative order of the Internet, highlighting how legal, technical, and social rules can jointly contribute to responsible Internet governance.

Vorschu der Publikation "Internationale Regeln für Soziale Medien: Menschenrechte wahren und Desinformation bekämpfen. Global Governance" Spotlight 2|2019
Available as Download

Safeguarding Human Rights and Fighting Disinformation

In the Global Governance Spotlight 2/2019, Matthias C. Kettemann examines the successes and deficits of previous norm-building processes and regulatory efforts in the field of social media, particularly at regional and global level.

Cover
Open Access

How Do Intermediaries Shape News-Related Media Repertoires and Practices?

Based on focus groups and interviews, this study examines the role of online intermediaries such as search engines, social networking sites and video platforms in the political information repertoires of German users.

Portrait Matthias C. Kettemann
Review

Review of Caldarola/Schrey (2019), Big Data and the Law: An Introduction for Practitioners

Matthias C. Kettemann reviews Caldarola and Schrey’s introduction to the legal challenges of big data, highlighting how the book addresses key issues of data processing, data protection, and digital innovation.

Cover
Article in Handbook

Blogs

Jan-Hinrik Schmidt provides an overview of blogs as an object of empirical social research and outlines methodological approaches for studying them.

Cover
Article in Journal of Media Education

Public Childhood in Parent Blogs? Findings of a Survey of German-Speaking Parent Bloggers

Jan-Hinrik Schmidt and Kali Richter examine how parent blogs affect children's privacy and informational self-determination, highlighting the challenges they pose for protecting children's rights online.

Cover
Available Online

Explaining Online News Engagement Based on Browsing Behavior: Creatures of Habit?

This study examines the extent to which traditional predictors of news consumption—such as age, gender, political interest, and trust in the media—influence preferences for three different ways of accessing news online.

Stephan Dreyer
Recently published

It’s Complicated: Protecting Minors from Harmful Media Content in Germany

His objective has the protection of minors from harmful media clearly in sight: to enable children and young people to grow up safely with media. Risks and dangers in media relations should be kept away from them. But creating laws for it is anything but easy. Who regulates what in the protection of minors from harmful media in Germany? Stephan Dreyer gives an overview.

Portrait Matthias C. Kettemann
Review

Review of Bechtold/Bosch, GWB: Act Against Restraints of Competition

Matthias C. Kettemann reviews Bechtold and Bosch’s commentary on the German Act Against Restraints of Competition, highlighting its relevance for legal debates on competition, regulation, and digital markets.

1 … 40 41 42 43

Page 42 from 43

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now